|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 2005 - Message for you, sir!
-
Death isn't on the line, so I feel safe going against Sam Marcuccio in this discussion . I'll start at the bottom of Sam's post and work my way up. The last line says "The really funny part of all this is, based on the argument, you'd never guess which...
-
Consider the case of the bacon and egg breakfast. The chicken is involved, the pig is committed! Since my last post, I've done a Microsoft Webcast, become the bottleneck on a huge project at work, and taken on some pressing personal commitments. I've...
-
Steve Maine responds to my rant against attributes with some interesting and quite revealing comments about the centrality of attributes to the Indigo programming model. I'll leave aside the assumption that I want a new language, as I've already dealt...
-
In the comments to my last post, Bruce Williams (from the Indigo team) asks: Would it be accurate to say that you are (reasonably) satisfied with the _features_ of Indigo, but you don't want to use C# (as it exists today), but would prefer some mix of...
-
Rich Turner replies and I'm more confused than ever. He's wearing his Indigo-colored glasses and misreads just about everything I wrote. I'll leave aside the SOA discussion for now and concentrate on Indigo. I'll try to make this as plain as I can. I...
-
Rich Turner doesn't believe SOA exists and challenges SOA advocates to draw him a picture: This applies to anyone out there - if you've got an architecture that will help solve real business problems, then show me the picture. Don't list products to me...
-
Clemens Vaster doesn't think SO Architecture is real . Roy Osherove agrees . Udi Dahan disagrees . Rich Turner and Sam Gentile seem to be squarely in "let's drop the A in SOA" camp. This all reminds me of a conversation I had with Ted Neward on his blog...
|
|
|
|
|
|