login
my ps
about
contact
home
instructor-led training
online training
blogs
Don Box's Spoutlet
»
POX enters the Lexicon
POX enters the Lexicon
Don Box's Spoutlet
Home
Contact
Pluralsight Blogs
Scott Allen
Craig Andera
Mark Baciak
Don Box
Keith Brown
David Cowles
Tim Ewald
Jon Fancey
Jon Flanders
Kirill Gavrylyuk
Ian Griffiths
Martin Gudgin
Mike Henderson
Dr. Joe Hummel
Jim Johnson
Kevin Jones
Sahil Malik
Matt Milner
Ted Neward
Fritz Onion
Pluralsight
Brian Randell
Jeffrey Schlimmer
Aaron Skonnard
David Starr
Dan Sullivan
Doug Walters
Jim Wilson
Mike Woodring
Syndication
RSS for Posts
Atom
RSS for Comments
Email Notifications
Go
Recent Posts
Talks I want to see @ PDC
Paul Vick relocates to Oslo
Schlimmerblog
eWeek piece on Oslo
Another Oslo talk
Tags
.NET
DSL
MEF
Microsoft
Microsoft Solver Foundation
Modeling
MSF
Oslo
PDC
View more
Oslo
Doug Purdy
Chris Anderson
Gudge
Chris Sells
Jeff Schlimmer
Randy Kimmerly
Super Ninja
Archives
October 2008 (1)
September 2008 (6)
August 2008 (4)
July 2008 (3)
June 2008 (6)
May 2008 (3)
April 2008 (1)
February 2008 (4)
January 2008 (6)
December 2007 (2)
November 2007 (13)
October 2007 (9)
August 2007 (3)
May 2007 (6)
April 2007 (2)
March 2007 (5)
February 2007 (2)
January 2007 (13)
December 2006 (8)
October 2006 (2)
August 2006 (1)
July 2006 (3)
June 2006 (11)
May 2006 (15)
April 2006 (6)
March 2006 (7)
February 2006 (2)
January 2006 (9)
December 2005 (13)
November 2005 (4)
October 2005 (12)
September 2005 (15)
August 2005 (7)
July 2005 (32)
June 2005 (10)
May 2005 (8)
April 2005 (18)
March 2005 (4)
February 2005 (24)
January 2005 (5)
December 2004 (6)
November 2004 (20)
October 2004 (24)
September 2004 (5)
Many of us inside the big house use the term "plain old XML" or POX to describe XML sans SOAP.
Dare's the first one I've seen to
use it out in the wild
.
Dare's piece is well worth reading even if he didn't use one of my favorite phrases…
Posted
Feb 10 2005, 06:34 PM
by
don-box
Comments
Kevin Daly
wrote
re: POX enters the Lexicon
on 02-10-2005 3:09 PM
Seems inevitable but...um, there is the slight problem with pox *already being* in the lexicon.
If you wanted to use "POXy" for instance to refer to the quality of being or using XML sans SOAP, it wouldn't exactly sound neutral :-)
Which is a shame.
Jerry
wrote
re: POX enters the Lexicon
on 02-10-2005 10:46 PM
Don,
ever seen this fine pice of history :-)
http://www.comlay.net/ibmjarg.pdf
Dave
wrote
re: POX enters the Lexicon
on 02-11-2005 4:32 AM
Does one use ePOXy to help with bindings?
Keith Hill
wrote
re: POX enters the Lexicon
on 02-11-2005 2:12 PM
Don, I'd be interested in your take on this: http://blogs.zdnet.com/service-oriented/index.php?p=184 (Is SOAP Washed Out?)
James Governor
wrote
re: POX enters the Lexicon
on 02-15-2005 10:08 AM
well at least you will be assured of Register coverage. Poxy huh
Dare Obasanjo's WebLog
wrote
Understanding the Place of POX, SOAP and WS-* in Building XML Web Services
on 02-15-2005 10:37 AM
Dare Obasanjo's WebLog
wrote
Understanding the Place of POX, SOAP and WS-* in Building XML Web Services
on 02-15-2005 10:38 AM
Jelle Druyts
wrote
PowerPoint forgot to nail the basics
on 03-06-2005 6:32 AM
Olivier Travers
wrote
The War is Over (WS-* vs. POX/HTTP)
on 03-15-2005 3:27 AM
Joshua Allen: "On one side, we have the people who believe that WS-* specifications such as SOAP and WS-Security will eventually dominate. And on the other, we have people who believe that HTTP with plain old XML (POX) will outlast...
Dare Obasanjo aka Carnage4Life
wrote
Applying the Lessons of XML to JSON
on 08-14-2006 2:49 PM
Add a Comment
Name:
(required)
Website:
(optional)
Comments
(required)
Remember Me?
home
instructor-led training
online training
blogs
781.749.9238 (East Coast) | 310.251.9901 (West Coast) | Pluralsight, LLC , 185 Lincoln St., Suite 305, Hingham, MA 02043-1741
Copyright © 2008 Pluralsight LLC. All rights reserved.
designed by
nukeation